Monday, December 30, 2013

Don't Call It Feminine, It May Be Masculine

If the man's prior creation gave the man authority over the woman, we wouldn't talk about how men and women are different, for no reason would be needed. All that would have to be said is, "the man was created first." But because it just doesn't sound right, we have come up with all kinds of different reasons the man should have authority over the woman. One of them are the abstract ideals of "masculine" and "feminine."

What is masculine and what is feminine? Well, no one really knows. What we do know is that men are considered masculine, and women feminine. In addition, anything positive is usually found in the masculine department, and anything negative is found in the feminine department. For example, courage, strength, logic and reason are usually said to be masculine, and gullibility, weakness, and emotionality are thought to be feminine qualities. Hence, men are said to be courageous, strong, and rational, whereas women are said to be easily deceived, weak, and emotional. In the real world, however, real men and women do not fit neatly into these categories, wherefore we talk about feminine men and masculine women, and not with a positive tone. But if men were created to be masculine, if it is an innate instinct nurture cannot override, how can they be anything but masculine?
 
Because the one-verse-explanation doesn't cut it anymore in a world where men and women are technically (although not always practically) equal, hierarchical theology has become obsessed with the ideals of femininity and masculinity. Pink is for girls, blue is for boys; cheer leading is a girly activity, sports are for boys; writing is for girls, math is for boys, and so on. But only two generations ago little boys wore pink, a little older ones were cheer leaders, and yet a little older ones aspired to write the Great American Novel. 

Maybe we shouldn't call a trait feminine, for it may actually be masculine.

Masculinity and femininity are as versatile as water; they can take many shapes, and often they are thought to be something they aren't. Steam can look like smoke, ice can look like glass, snow resembles cotton candy. If we look only to the appearance, we will be deceived to believe to have found the real thing.

Or perhaps masculinity and femininity are versatile because there really are no strict ideals that all men and women must adhere to. Maybe we all invent femininity and masculinity as befits us;
maybe we will one day realize that being a man and woman has little to do with being feminine or masculine, for we are always men and women, but sometimes more feminine/masculine than other times; maybe we'll realize that it's ok for a girl to throw a ball like a boy and a boy to cry like a girl, for if you can do it, why not?

4 comments:

  1. Great points, Susanna. This is why I like to move away from biblical manhood or womanhood and instead look to Christ: http://timfall.wordpress.com/2013/04/24/biblical-womanhood-is-nothing-and-neither-is-biblical-manhood/

    Cheers,
    Tim

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Tim! Yes, it is important that we focus on God and not worldly values if we wish to follow God,

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi, Susanna! I encountered you whilst you were responding to Dale about alleged "errors" in your post over at the Junia project. Thank you for your posts interacting with him, which are full of useful information and continue to confirm for me that welcoming all people into full membership and ministry in God's Church is something the Gospel requires of us.

    I wanted to let you know about a post I just made to my own blog, here: Masculine and Feminine http://wp.me/p1VPBC-77, and I hope that you might have some initial thoughts about whether my intuition is correct?

    Your brother in Christ,
    Rob Walker (@TheologyWriter)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Rob! I think I remember seeing you over at King'd Dale blog! What a fun five days it ended up being, I hope we can do it again! I'll take a look at your blog, I'm sure it is great.

    Blessings,

    Susanna

    ReplyDelete