Monday, July 28, 2014

The Helper Who Provides and Protects



"It is the word “helper” that suggests the woman’s supportive role....  Subordination is entailed in the very nature of a helping role." - Raymond, C. Ortlund, Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, p 104

According to Ortlund, a "helper" is always subordinated to the one who is being helped. But because according to John Piper, the one who is being helped is the one who protects and provides (p 36), we have to somehow explain the following verse:



"Keep your lives free from the love of money and be content with what you have, because God has said, "Never will I leave you; never will I forsake you."  So we say with confidence, "The Lord is my helper; I will not be afraid. What can man do to me?"" (Heb 13:5-6  NIV)

God is portrayed as the one who helps us when he provides for and protects us


If the "helper" is always subordinated, and providing and protecting are signs of superiority in a relationship, we must divide God's help into two distinct categories:

 

1) God helps when he subordinates himself to us
2) God helps when he provides for and protects us



What would Ortlund say?  

"The fallacy lies in the implication of what she says, namely, that God cannot be subordinate to human beings. He does so whenever He undertakes to help us. He does not “un-God” Himself in helping us; but stoops down to our needs, according to His gracious and sovereign will. Similarly, I subordinate myself to my children when I help them with their homework. … So it is with God. When He helps His people, He retains His glorious deity but (amazingly!) steps into the servant role, under us, to lift us up. He is the God who emptied Himself and came down to our level – below us, to the level of slavery – to help us supremely at the Cross. Therefore, the fact that the Old Testament portrays God as our Helper proves only that the helper role is a glorious one, worthy even the Almighty." (p. 104)



Yet, because God's help is so often described as that of a superior, Grudem doesn't agree:
"It is true that God is often called our “helper,” but the word itself does not imply anything about rank or authority. The context must decide whether Eve is to “help” as a strong person who aids a weaker one, or as one who assists a loving leader. The context makes it very unlikely that helper should be read on the analogy of God’s help, because in Genesis 2:19-20 Adam is caused to seek his “helper” first among the animals. … Yet in passing through “helpful” animals to woman, God teaches us that the woman is a man’s “helper” in the sense of a loyal and suitable assistant in the life of the garden. The question seems to assume that because the word (like helper) has certain connotations (“Godlikeness”) in some places it must have them in every place." (p. 87)

In other words, the woman's help must be compared to that of the animals to prevent her from becoming the help that protects and provides. But by doing so, Grudem removes the woman's humanity.

Christian: So which one is it? Does the word “help” subordinate the woman to the man, or not?

Theologian: I think there is a huge problem with the concept of the woman being a help. Someone who helps others doesn’t have to help. Help is optional. God doesn’t always help us, even when we ask him, and the Bible is full of warnings against the kind of behavior that will get a cold shoulder from God in time of need.

Christian: So why is she called a help?

Theologian: Is she?

Christian: What do you mean?

Theologian: Is the woman called a help, or is the woman the help the man needed? If it wasn’t good for the man to be alone, what did he need: another human or a servant?

Christian: Another human?

Theologian: If the man needed another human, why did God create a woman to “help” the man? Do your friends help you?

Christian: Sometimes they do.

Theologian: Do they have to help you?

Christian: Only if they want to.

Theologian: Do you help your friends?

Christian: Of course I do!

Theologian: So if your friends help you and you help your friends, what’s the difference?

Christian: There is none.

Theologian: Do we help God?

Christian: Sometimes.

Theologian: And does God help us?

Christian: Yes, of course he does.

Theologian: If we help God and God helps us, what’s the difference?

Christian: Maybe there is a difference in how we help God and how God helps us?

Theologian: Is there?

Christian: Well, yes. God is, well… God.

Theologian: True. So when God helps us it is a help we couldn’t have provided ourselves.

Christian: Exactly.

Theologian: And if that is the case, God’s help is not that of a subordinate, for someone who is subordinate helps with menial things.

Christian: Yes, I would say that is accurate.

Theologian: If God’s help is that of a superior, can we compare the woman’s help to God’s help?

Christian: Only if we want to make the woman superior to the man.

Theologian: If we don’t wish to make the woman superior to the man, we must compare her help to that of an equal, or to that of an inferior.

Christian: But how can we tell which one it is.

Theologian: Is a woman a human or an animal?

Christian: A human, of course!

Theologian: Then she is the man’s equal.

Christian: Naturally.

Theologian: If she is the man’s equal, her help must be that of an equal.

Christian: Why can’t it be that of someone who is subordinated?

Theologian: Does your friend become your subject when he helps you?

Christian: No, of course not.

Theologian: If your friend doesn’t become your subject when he helps you, and God doesn’t become our equal when he helps us, we must retain our original position towards those we help.

Christian: That seems fair to me, but is it not possible that the woman was created to help the man in a special way that makes her the man’s equal, yet his subject at the same time?

Theologian: Does the man help the woman?

Christian: I think so.

Theologian: How does a man help a woman?

Christian: Well, one of the obvious answers is that the man helps the woman become a mother.

Theologian: Does it make the man the woman’s subject?

Christian: Not really.

Theologian: So your friend doesn’t become your subject when he helps you, God doesn’t become our equal when he helps us, and a man doesn’t become the woman’s subject when he helps her. Why would the woman become the man’s subject when she helps the man?

Christian: There seems to be no reason.

Theologian: And what about the animals? Do they become our subjects because they help us, or do they help us because they are our subjects?

Christian: They help us because they are our subjects.
Theologian: Hence the same must be true of the woman. If she was created to help the man, she was by creation the man’s subject, and never his equal. 
Equality cannot contain inequality, wherefore the woman had to either be the man's equal or his subject from creation. If the woman was created the man's subject, human equality doesn't exist; if the woman was created the man's equal, human equality is a reality. We cannot have it both ways. In the end, the woman wasn't created to help the man, she was created to be with the man. It was her humanity that ended the man's loneliness, and ever since that day humans have sought the companionship of other humans, for it isn't good for a human to be alone. 


***


Verses that describe God's help


Deut 33:29
Blessed are you, O Israel!

Who is like you,
a people saved by the LORD?
He is your shield and helper
and your glorious sword.
Your enemies will cower before you,
and you will trample down their high places."


Ps 18:1-3
I love you, O LORD, my strength.
The LORD is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer;
my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge.
He is my shield and the horn of my salvation, my stronghold.
I call to the LORD, who is worthy of praise,
and I am saved from my enemies.


Ps 27:8-9
My heart says of you, "Seek his face!"
Your face, LORD, I will seek.
Do not hide your face from me,
do not turn your servant away in anger;
you have been my helper.
Do not reject me or forsake me,
O God my Savior.

Ps 33:20-22
We wait in hope for the LORD;
he is our help and our shield.
In him our hearts rejoice,
for we trust in his holy name.
May your unfailing love rest upon us, O LORD,
even as we put our hope in you.

Ps 40:17
Yet I am poor and needy;
may the Lord think of me.
You are my help and my deliverer;
O my God, do not delay.


Ps 54:3-4
Strangers are attacking me;
ruthless men seek my life--
men without regard for God.
Selah 
Surely God is my help;
the Lord is the one who sustains me.

Ps 63:6-8
On my bed I remember you;
I think of you through the watches of the night.
Because you are my help,
I sing in the shadow of your wings.
My soul clings to you;
your right hand upholds me.


Ps 94:16-19
Who will rise up for me against the wicked?
Who will take a stand for me against evildoers?
Unless the LORD had given me help,
I would soon have dwelt in the silence of death.
When I said, "My foot is slipping,"
your love, O LORD, supported me.
When anxiety was great within me,
your consolation brought joy to my soul.

Ps 118:5-7 
In my anguish I cried to the LORD,
and he answered by setting me free.
The LORD is with me; I will not be afraid.
What can man do to me?
The LORD is with me; he is my helper.
I will look in triumph on my enemies.

Isa 41:10
So do not fear, for I am with you;
do not be dismayed, for I am your God.
I will strengthen you and help you;
I will uphold you with my righteous right hand.

Isa 41:14 
Do not be afraid, O worm Jacob,
O little Israel,
for I myself will help you," declares the LORD,
your Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel.

Saturday, July 26, 2014

Church and Home, Shepherds and Lords


Servant leadership sound great, even pious. Of course the man was created to serve by leading! ... until we read the rest of the Bible and find that leading is about setting an example for others to imitate. 

[I]f all Christians should serve one another, how can a man serve his wife and exercise authority over her at the same time?[i] Hierarchical theologers tell us a husband serves his wife as a servant leader. But what exactly does a servant leader do? A servant leader serves by leading, we are told by these same theologers. But this begs the question, should all leaders in the church serve by leading, or is this something that is restricted to married men? Peter the Apostle, for example, tells us in his first letter that a leader in the church is a person who leads by setting an example of servanthood instead of lording it over the flock. In other words, leaders in the church lead by serving. If overseers served the laity by leading, everyone would have to strive to become a leader, for leading would be the example given for everyone to imitate.[ii] With this insight the questions keep on multiplying, for if an overseer leads by serving, and if leaders in the church should not be lords in the house of God, why should a husband serve by leading, and be a lord in his own house? [iii] Is it possible that God gave husbands more authority than anyone else in the church? (Genesis 3: The Origin of Gender Roles, Chapter 5) 

The picture Peter paints before us in 1 Peter 5:1-5 is a shepherd leading the sheep to a better pastures. The sheep follow the shepherd because they know he will feed them. Feeding someone has nothing to do with authority; it has to do with love. 

Overseers in the church are called pastors because of the Latin word pastor, which means shepherd. Peter refers to Jesus as the Chief Shepherd (Greek, archipoimen), and he advices his fellow shepherds to abstain from lording over the flock (Greek, katakurieuo), the very same word Jesus used in Matt 20:24-28:
 

"When the ten heard about this, they were indignant with the two brothers. Jesus called them together and said, "You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them (katakurieuo), and their high officials exercise authority over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your slave- just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many." (NIV)

Now, this idea of giving one's life as a ransom instead of being a lord is also echoed in John 10:11-18, where Jesus calls himself a good shepherd: 


"I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. The hired hand is not the shepherd who owns the sheep. So when he sees the wolf coming, he abandons the sheep and runs away. Then the wolf attacks the flock and scatters it. The man runs away because he is a hired hand and cares nothing for the sheep. "I am the good shepherd; I know my sheep and my sheep know me- just as the Father knows me and I know the Father-and I lay down my life for the sheep. I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd. The reason my Father loves me is that I lay down my life-only to take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again. This command I received from my Father." (NIV)

If the model for overseers is the shepherd who serves the sheep and willingly gives his life, why is the model for husbands a lord who commands his wife?

Is Christ divided?



 



[i] Galatians 5:13
[ii] 1 Peter 5:3
[iii] 1 Peter 3:6